« November 2008 | Main | January 2009 »
Dementor, Dr. Marion, sucking all that's good about medicine out of a resident
I, like most first year clinical fellows, felt a little awkward. Just removed from the great unwashed mass of internal medicine residents, I was already supposed to exude rheumatology-ness when interacting with colleagues I had shared call with only weeks before. It takes a bit of knowledge, a bit of show, but everybody generally plays along.
Posted at 04:29 PM in Mentors and Dementors | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
At the last rheumatology conference we were entertained by the use of audience polling/questioning and instant response via touchpads provided to every participant. A question was posed and we had ten seconds to answer. We were then given instant tabulated results which I have to admit was fun and actually quite informative. I guess the reason for these gadgets was simply to increase our attention, knowing that we would be asked a question after the talk. Those CME guys are always thinking up new tricks. But I think the idea could be used more effectively. In fact, I think an entire session could simply be dedicated to asking questions about common practice choices and comparing answers. Anonymity could also provide cover for some truly revealing questions like:
If you use anti-inflammatories yourself, which do you use?
If you developed RA today, how would you treat yourself?
If you had a prostate/breast cancer, would you take an Anti-TNF for your RA.
If you were a bone, what bone would you be?
Of course, the same could be done with a blog, but that would require actual readers and you would have to be wary of pharyngula-like poll crashing by pharmaceutical companies.
Another interesting thing about the touchpad users at the conference was the difference in age and comfort with the technology. I don't want to generalize too much but several older rheumatologists did not play along, while some fifty-sixty-ish docs were aiming their touch pads at the screen up front like a TV remote with a bad battery. I'm not sure but I think I saw a rheum fellow waving her touchpad at the screen, coaxing her response numbers up in Wii-like fashion. I'm sure the CME types noticed as well.
Rheum fellows at next ACR convention
Posted at 09:56 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I complained not too long ago about the lack of evidence to support an evidence-based clinical practice in rheumatology. Not more than a week later I had rather dramatic confirmation of this stand. At our latest rheumatology conference we had a guest speaker from the local physiatry group talk about his approach to the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. He started out by enumerating the causes of mechanical back pain and claimed that 15-30% of low back cases are of sacroiliac origin. It's an odd feeling being told that you have incorrectly diagnosed 30% of your back patients over the last twenty years. By the look of my colleagues, they had the same funny feeling. So we all pretty well wrote him off. Rheumatologists in general don't talk much about the sacroiliac joint unless it's inflamed, then we talk about it a lot. It's a big unmoveable beast that shouldn't cause mechanical trouble. Nobody I know would suggest treating low back pain with specific sacroiliac measures. In a fairly recent review of back pain, a rheumatologist mentioned this joint in her differential of low back disorders and promptly got a letter to the editor rebuking her for it. This was rebutted by a train of dissenters from around the world and from several specialties. If you check out rheumatology texts, or at least the ancient tomes that I possess, sacroiliac joints are pretty well sequestered in the ankylosing spondylitis chapters. They may be mentioned in the low back section, but nobody deigns to expand upon the subject. In the physiatry/chiro/spine type literature though, there is ample reference to investigations using controlled selective injections which prove not just the existence, but the regularity of this condition.
Posted at 01:23 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
While doing my usual exhaustive research for my post on phlegm, I came upon a site called colourlovers. It is apparently a forum to discuss color, design and all things pretty so I was a little surprised to see it show up in my google search for phlegm. As it turns out, the color creations often come with rather unique names, and the following was titled PHLEGM:
Posted at 07:44 PM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)